SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 54
Baixar para ler offline
1
2
SQL
Server
IIS on W2k Server
.NET
managed
component
ASP
.NET
Windows
Client
Browser
3
DB
Server
Java App
Server
EJB
Servlet
JSP
Java
Client
Browser
◦ Both multi-tiered, similar computing
technologies
◦ Both support “standards”
◦ Both offer different tools & ways to achieve
the same goal.
◦ A lot of parallelism can be seen.
◦ Very difficult to compare and qualify the
comparison because each has its own
advantages & disadvantages.
4
 Java Pet Store is Sun‟s primary blueprint application
for J2EE
◦ Source: http://java.sun.com/j2ee/blueprints
◦ Illustrates best coding practices for J2EE
◦ Ships as a sample application in IBM Websphere, Oracle
Application Server 9i, Sun iPlanet, and
BEA WebLogic
 The .NET Petshop is a port of the J2EE Java Pet Store
to .NET
◦ Source: http://www.gotdotnet.com/compare
◦ Implements the same functionality as Java Pet Store
◦ Illustrates best coding practices for .NET Framework
 In the TMC Petshop Performance Case Study, The
Middleware Company implemented both the Java Pet
Store and the .Net Petshop.
◦ The J2EE version ran on two different application servers
◦ All versions used the same hardware and OS
5
◦ The Storefront presents the main user
interface in a Web front-end. Customers
use the Storefront to place orders for pets.
◦ The Order Processing Center (OPC)
receives orders from the Storefront.
◦ The Supplier fulfills orders from the OPC
from inventory and invoices the OPC.
◦ The Admin presents the administrator
interface in a JFC/Swing front-end.
Administrators use the Admin to examine
pending orders and approve or deny
them.
6
7
8
14000
7500
9000
5000
2500
15500
11500
Java Pet Store
Lines of Code Required
User
Interface
4,410
Data TierMiddle Tier
2,865
.NET Petshop
14,273
5,891
ConfigurationTotal Lines
of Code
710
5,404
761 412 74
2,566
9
10
◦ Based on Oracle-published data for tuned version of Java Pet
Store
◦ Using Oracle‟s test scripts from their “9i App Server Challenge”
◦ Run on equivalent hardware
11
1.0
0
0
User Load Level
ResponseTime(Seconds)
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 2750
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.8
2800% Better performance
Supporting 6 times more users
 Microsoft concludes: ".NET is 28 times faster
than J2EE"
◦ Because:
◦ “Java PetShop” is Sun‟s “best practice” example
◦ Numbers compared with published Oracle results
◦ Identical functionality, all code published and
documented
 Can we believe the raw numbers? Yes!
◦ Why? Microsoft delivers full docs on the entire scenario
 But 28 times really?
12
 Java PetShop: J2EE blueprint application
◦ Built by Sun to show "best practice" design
◦ Implementation by TMC missed quite a few
optimizations
 .NET PetShop
◦ Built by TMC (with help from MS) with different
design
 Plain classes instead of container managed
components
 Middle tier moved into ASP.NET
 Using stored procedures instead of ad-hoc SQL
 Uses server-side caching of ASP.NET
 Many performance optimizations applied
 Most Java devotees find this highly unfair 13
 Re-implementation of J2EE version
◦ 17 times performance increase
◦ Second version showed some J2EE implementation
equal .Net
◦ Second version is a testimony to performance
tuning
14
 It is very difficult to make such comparisons
 That .Net has gained maturity extremely fast
 That the two frameworks are very similar
 The Devil is in the detail
15
So let‟s look at some details
16
VBC++C#PerlPython…
VisualStudio.net
Win32
MSMQ, COM+, IIS,
WMI, AD, ADAM,
Indexing, UDDI, etc.
CLR
Base Class Library
ADO.NET
ASP.Net
P&P blocks
Win32, Unix, Linux
JMS Apache
J2EE App Servers
Websphere, Weblogic, Tomcat, etc.
Java runtime
J2EE Class Library
Third party extensions
JDBC
Servlets
JSP
Struts
Extensions:
Phoenix, Tiles, Java Faces
Enterprise solutions
BEAWeblogicWebshpereStudioEclipse…
Java
◦ C# is an object oriented language of the C++/Java
flavor
◦ Syntax similar to Java and C/C++.
◦ Quite an impressive design and care for details
◦ Java developers will feel comfortable
 most of the time and frustrated when things are
different
◦ MS says: “C# combines the power of VC++ with the
ease of usage of VB”
 Not really true:
 C# is really powerful BUT
 It is not easy to learn for non C++/Java programmers
◦ It is the language to learn if you are serious about
.NET!
17
// This is a comment in Java code
class HelloWorld{
public static void main(String[] args){
for(int i= 1; i<= 100; i++)
System.out.println("Hello!");
}
}
// This is a comment in C#
using System;
class HelloWorld{
static void Main(){
for(int i=1; i<=100; i++)
Console.WriteLine("Hello");
}
}
}
18
 Java
◦ int, float, double, etc.
◦ Allocated on stack
◦ Not an Object
◦ Not extensible
 C#
◦ int, float, double, etc.
◦ structs
◦ Allocated on stack
◦ Inherited from object
class
◦ structs can implement
interfaces
◦ Cannot inherit from
another class
19
// C#
struct Point
{
int x;
int y;
Point(int x, int y)
{
this.x = x;
this.y = y;
}
}
 Java
◦ All methods are implicitly
virtual
 C#
◦ Explicitly use „virtual‟ and
„override‟ keywords
20
class B
{
public void foo() { }
}
class D extends B
{
public void foo() { }
}
// D’s foo() overrides B’s foo()
class B
{
public virtual void foo() { }
}
class D:B
{
public override void foo() { }
}
// D’s foo() overrides B’s foo()
 Java
◦ C++-style try/catch
blocks
◦ finally– action done even
after an exception is
caught
◦ throws – methods identify
what exceptions they
throw
 C#
◦ C++-style try/catch
blocks
◦ finally – same as Java
◦ Does not support throws
clause
21
// Java – throws an IOException
public void myFunc(int a) throws IOException
{
// Work…
}
// Java and C#
try {
// Stuff…
}
catch {
// Ack!
}
finally {
// Always!
}
22
23
24
25
• No automatic fall-through from one case block to the next
• Strongly-typed enums
• By reference calls are explicit at caller AND callee
• Method overrides are explicit
• Supports versioning
• Structs (value types)
• Integrated support for properties and events
• Can still use pointers with RAD language
• Can share data and use functionality with components written
in many different languages
26
C#
Managed
C/C++
Lots of other
Languages
VB
.Net
CLR
CTS GC Security
Runtime Services
MSIL
Windows OS
Java
JRE (JVM)
GC Security
Runtime Services
Byte Codes
Mac Unix LinuxWin
Both are „middle layers‟ between an intermediate
language & the underlying OS
 ECMA standardisation
◦ ECMA 334 and 335
 The Mono Project
◦ Shared Source Common Language Runtime
◦ CLI, C# and Jscript
◦ FreeBSD and Windows implementations
◦ Linux port underway
 DOT GNU project
◦ Portable .Net implementation
◦ C# for both CIL and JVM
27
◦ JVM designed for platform independence
 Single language: Java (?)
 A separate JVM for each OS & device
◦ CLR designed for language independence
 Multiple languages for development
 C++, VB, C#, (J#)
 APL, COBOL, Eiffel, Forth, Fortran, Haskel, SML, Mercury, Mond
rian, Oberon, Pascal, Perl, Python, RPG, Scheme, SmallScript, …
 Impressive usage of formal methods and programming
language research during development
 Impressive extensions for generics and support for functional
languages underway
 Underlying OS: Windows (?)
28
 Java byte code (or JVML) is the low-level language of the
JVM.
 MSIL (or CIL or IL) is the low-level language of the .NET
Common Language Runtime (CLR).
 Superficially, the two languages look very similar.
 One difference is that MSIL is designed only for JIT
compilation.
 The generic add instruction would require an interpreter
to track the data type of the top of stack element, which
would be prohibitively expensive.
29
JVML:
iload 1
iload 2
iadd
istore 3
MSIL:
ldloc.1
ldloc.2
add
stloc.3
30
JVM CLR
Managed execution
environment
X X
Garbage Collection X X
Metadata and
Bytecode
X X
Platform-
abstraction class
library
X X
Runtime-level
security
X X
Runs across
hardware platforms
X ?
 J2EE (1.5) preview of 26.4.2004
◦ Focus on ease of development
 Generics and metadata as in J2SE 1.5 (more like C#)
 Java Studio Creator tool (in beta from April 2004)
(more like Visual Studio .Net)
◦ Timeframe
 To be discussed at JavaOne in June
 Finalized in approximately one year
◦ IBM push for truly open source Java
◦ Others hesitate (even Open Source JBoss)
31
 Web Services are fine as n-tier applications
with UI provided through browser, but …
 On mobile devices WAP hasn‟t really caught
on
 Even iMode hasn‟t caught on in Europe
 Renewed Thin/Thick client discussion
 Java applications on Mobile devices are
reasonably successful
 Now Microsoft is moving fast into the field
with .Net Compact Framework
32
33
Nokia 6600 Orange SPV E200
34
 Mobile device
◦ Software infrastructure, hardware requirements
 Communication technology
◦ On-/Offline scenario
◦ Wireless Wide Area Networks/ Wireless Local Area
Networks
◦ Communication protocol
 Application architecture scenario
◦ Thin/fat client
 Data management
◦ Synchronisation
◦ On-/offline capabilities
 Security issues
◦ Dangers for mobile devices
◦ Threats of communication technology
◦ Danger of exposing enterprise data
35
 Java 2 Micro Edition (J2ME) is not ONE Java edition
 An J2ME compliant application consists of
◦ Configuration
◦ Profile (e.g. Personal, Mobile Information Device Profile
(MIDP))
◦ Application code
◦ Vendor specific UI
 3 Contenders to compare
◦ Java 2 Micro Edition – Connected Device Configuration
(CDC)
◦ Java 2 Micro Edition – Connected Limited Device
Configuration (CLDC)
◦ Microsoft .NET Compact Framework
36
The Java vs. Net discussion goes mobile
 Group of Master Level Students (Hovedfag)
◦ Bjørn D. Rasmussen
◦ Casper S. Jensen
◦ Jimmy Nielsen
◦ Lasse Jensen
 Collaboration with DEIF
 Project Goals
◦ Build end-to-end mobile
client, wireless, webservices based application with
back-end interface to SCADA
◦ In Java (J2ME/J2EE) and in .Net
◦ Compare the two solutions on a set of criteria
37
Objective measurements
 Lines of code
 Development tools
 Documentation
 Infrastructure
 Performance
 Architectural pattern
 Security
 Price
 Development time
Subjective measurements
 Developer satisfaction
 End-user satisfaction
38
39
40
 Server-side is well supported by both Java and .NET
IDEs
 On the client-side .NET IDEs benefit from the fact that
.NET CF is so close to .NET (With Java there are
separate IDEs for desktop and mobile application
development)
 Compatibility problems between Java vendors
 Java IDEs are slow!
 C# is a richer/more complex language than Java
 Both Java and .NET have well documented API
 Web service documentation
◦ .NET - MSDN
◦ Java – Google
 Support for encryption of web services
◦ .Net CF: HTTPS and SOAP extensions 41
 Server-side web service performance study
with:
◦ Microsoft Application Server (v. 5.1)
◦ Sun ONE Application Server (v. 7.0)
 Tested for:
◦ Throughput
◦ Failure rate
◦ Average response time
42
43
44
45
 Slow start-up when developing in Java
◦ Jungle of web service implementations
◦ IDE incompatibility problems
 Emulators
 kSOAP
 Trouble-free implementation in .NET
46
 Developer satisfaction
◦ VS.NET integrates web service and mobile
application development far better than any Java
IDE
◦ A subset of an API is a better solution for mobile
devices instead of an entirely new API
 End-user satisfaction
◦ DEIF would choose a .NET based solution since
startup time is very important
◦ DEIF only needs a limited number of IDE licenses
◦ Extra price for a SmartPhone 2003 is insignificant
compared to the value it gives
◦ The SmartPhone 2003 is more ”fancy” than the Java
phones 47
 We see .NET as a better designed framework
because:
◦ it eliminates the language barrier while also being
platform independent
◦ it makes only little distinction between desktop and
mobile application development
 Sun‟s application server performance is very poor
compared to IIS.
 License fees for a Java based solution are cheaper
but .NET might catch up when considering
development time
 We tried a combined .NET and Java solution but
this has shown to be very troublesome!
48
 The two worlds are becoming more and more
similar
◦ But it seems that you have to work harder in Java
than in .Net
◦ .Net is currently driving technology transfer from
Research to Product
 Windows generation at University now
 Watch-out in the mobile world
 Vodafone to offer Microsoft Smart phones
◦ http://msmobiles.com/news.php/2504.html
◦ Fed-up with Nokia promoting own brand, rather
than operator brand 49
 It is very difficult to make such comparisons
 That .Net has gained maturity extremely fast
 That the two frameworks are very similar
 You will not be sacked for choosing the right
J2EE application server ;-)
 The Devil is in the detail
◦ C# is not Java
◦ ADO.NET is not JDBC
◦ CLR is not JVM
◦ CF.Net smartphones are very different from Java
Smartphones
50
 The ultimate choice usually depends
not on technical superiority, but on:
◦ cultural/”religious”/political preferences
◦ Skill set of your developers
◦ Customer preference
◦ Vendor relations
51
 The two frameworks are becoming more and
more alike
 However:
◦ .Net is Microsoft‟s core strategy
 .Net will be part of OS in the next generation of
Windows
 Lot‟s of innovation in Longhorn –
Avalon, indogo, WinFS
◦ Is Java in Sun‟s core strategy?
 Java 1.5 SE is very close to C# 2.0/.Net CLR
 Sun Java Studio Creator somewhat close to VS.Net
 Some talk of JVM as multi-language platform, but not
really so far …
 Sun in “Java as Open Source” battle with IBM 52
53
Sun vs. Microsoft Stock Prices
54
Choosing between Java and .Net
• You are most likely to be developing in both
environments for the foreseeable future
– Gartner Group: 30+% of all enterprise applications will have both J2EE
and .Net code
– Often IIS in front of J2EE infrastructure
– Interoperability issues
• Web Services (often too slow or doesn‟t support …)
• J2EE/.Net bridge (IL -> JBC or JBC ->IL)
• Look out for “The third way”
– Linux, Apache, MySQL, PhP, …
• Look out for disruptive technologies
– It only takes one guy to get the right idea
– and a small team to implement a completely new platform
– and One large company to productise it
– or a lot of grassroots …

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Virtualization in cloud computing ppt
Virtualization in cloud computing pptVirtualization in cloud computing ppt
Virtualization in cloud computing pptMehul Patel
 
What is Virtualization and its types & Techniques.What is hypervisor and its ...
What is Virtualization and its types & Techniques.What is hypervisor and its ...What is Virtualization and its types & Techniques.What is hypervisor and its ...
What is Virtualization and its types & Techniques.What is hypervisor and its ...Shashi soni
 
Introduction to Deep Learning, Keras, and TensorFlow
Introduction to Deep Learning, Keras, and TensorFlowIntroduction to Deep Learning, Keras, and TensorFlow
Introduction to Deep Learning, Keras, and TensorFlowSri Ambati
 
Cloud computing (IT-703) UNIT 1 & 2
Cloud computing (IT-703) UNIT 1 & 2Cloud computing (IT-703) UNIT 1 & 2
Cloud computing (IT-703) UNIT 1 & 2Jitendra s Rathore
 
Introduction to virtualization
Introduction to virtualizationIntroduction to virtualization
Introduction to virtualizationAhmad Hafeezi
 
Android SDK Tutorial | Edureka
Android SDK Tutorial | EdurekaAndroid SDK Tutorial | Edureka
Android SDK Tutorial | EdurekaEdureka!
 
Data center virtualization
Data center virtualizationData center virtualization
Data center virtualizationmazin Salih
 
Cloud computing and utility computing
Cloud computing and utility computingCloud computing and utility computing
Cloud computing and utility computingasmita tarar
 
Types of clouds in cloud computing
Types of clouds in cloud computingTypes of clouds in cloud computing
Types of clouds in cloud computingMahesh Chemmala
 
Virtualization Vs. Containers
Virtualization Vs. ContainersVirtualization Vs. Containers
Virtualization Vs. Containersactualtechmedia
 
Federated learning in brief
Federated learning in briefFederated learning in brief
Federated learning in briefShashi Perera
 
Introduction to TensorFlow 2.0
Introduction to TensorFlow 2.0Introduction to TensorFlow 2.0
Introduction to TensorFlow 2.0Databricks
 
OpenStack Tutorial
OpenStack TutorialOpenStack Tutorial
OpenStack TutorialBret Piatt
 

Mais procurados (20)

Virtualization in cloud computing ppt
Virtualization in cloud computing pptVirtualization in cloud computing ppt
Virtualization in cloud computing ppt
 
Keras and TensorFlow
Keras and TensorFlowKeras and TensorFlow
Keras and TensorFlow
 
What is Virtualization and its types & Techniques.What is hypervisor and its ...
What is Virtualization and its types & Techniques.What is hypervisor and its ...What is Virtualization and its types & Techniques.What is hypervisor and its ...
What is Virtualization and its types & Techniques.What is hypervisor and its ...
 
Introduction to Deep Learning, Keras, and TensorFlow
Introduction to Deep Learning, Keras, and TensorFlowIntroduction to Deep Learning, Keras, and TensorFlow
Introduction to Deep Learning, Keras, and TensorFlow
 
Cloud computing (IT-703) UNIT 1 & 2
Cloud computing (IT-703) UNIT 1 & 2Cloud computing (IT-703) UNIT 1 & 2
Cloud computing (IT-703) UNIT 1 & 2
 
SQLite - Overview
SQLite - OverviewSQLite - Overview
SQLite - Overview
 
Introduction to virtualization
Introduction to virtualizationIntroduction to virtualization
Introduction to virtualization
 
Android SDK Tutorial | Edureka
Android SDK Tutorial | EdurekaAndroid SDK Tutorial | Edureka
Android SDK Tutorial | Edureka
 
Introduction to docker
Introduction to dockerIntroduction to docker
Introduction to docker
 
Data center virtualization
Data center virtualizationData center virtualization
Data center virtualization
 
Cloud provenance
Cloud provenanceCloud provenance
Cloud provenance
 
Cloud computing and utility computing
Cloud computing and utility computingCloud computing and utility computing
Cloud computing and utility computing
 
Types of clouds in cloud computing
Types of clouds in cloud computingTypes of clouds in cloud computing
Types of clouds in cloud computing
 
Virtualization Vs. Containers
Virtualization Vs. ContainersVirtualization Vs. Containers
Virtualization Vs. Containers
 
Federated learning in brief
Federated learning in briefFederated learning in brief
Federated learning in brief
 
Introduction to TensorFlow 2.0
Introduction to TensorFlow 2.0Introduction to TensorFlow 2.0
Introduction to TensorFlow 2.0
 
.Net
.Net.Net
.Net
 
OpenStack Tutorial
OpenStack TutorialOpenStack Tutorial
OpenStack Tutorial
 
Virtualization
VirtualizationVirtualization
Virtualization
 
Virtualization 101
Virtualization 101Virtualization 101
Virtualization 101
 

Semelhante a Java vs .Net

FRAUD DETECTION IN ONLINE AUCTIONING
FRAUD DETECTION IN ONLINE AUCTIONINGFRAUD DETECTION IN ONLINE AUCTIONING
FRAUD DETECTION IN ONLINE AUCTIONINGSatish Chandra
 
Csharp dot net
Csharp dot netCsharp dot net
Csharp dot netEkam Baram
 
Java Programming 100 Programming Challenges
Java Programming 100 Programming ChallengesJava Programming 100 Programming Challenges
Java Programming 100 Programming ChallengesJavier Crisostomo
 
Java Semimar Slide (Cetpa)
Java Semimar Slide (Cetpa)Java Semimar Slide (Cetpa)
Java Semimar Slide (Cetpa)Pratima Parida
 
Java Semimar Slide (Cetpa)
Java Semimar Slide (Cetpa)Java Semimar Slide (Cetpa)
Java Semimar Slide (Cetpa)Pratima Parida
 
ASP.NET Session 1
ASP.NET Session 1ASP.NET Session 1
ASP.NET Session 1Sisir Ghosh
 
Introduction to Java
Introduction to Java Introduction to Java
Introduction to Java Hitesh-Java
 
J2ee strutswithhibernate-140121221332-phpapp01
J2ee strutswithhibernate-140121221332-phpapp01J2ee strutswithhibernate-140121221332-phpapp01
J2ee strutswithhibernate-140121221332-phpapp01Jay Palit
 
Project report for final year project
Project report for final year projectProject report for final year project
Project report for final year projectsuneel singh
 
Java & J2EE Struts with Hibernate Framework
Java & J2EE Struts with Hibernate FrameworkJava & J2EE Struts with Hibernate Framework
Java & J2EE Struts with Hibernate FrameworkMohit Belwal
 
.Net introduction by Quontra Solutions
.Net introduction by Quontra Solutions.Net introduction by Quontra Solutions
.Net introduction by Quontra SolutionsQUONTRASOLUTIONS
 
Java programming(unit 1)
Java programming(unit 1)Java programming(unit 1)
Java programming(unit 1)SURBHI SAROHA
 

Semelhante a Java vs .Net (20)

Sadiq786
Sadiq786Sadiq786
Sadiq786
 
Csharp dot net
Csharp dot netCsharp dot net
Csharp dot net
 
FRAUD DETECTION IN ONLINE AUCTIONING
FRAUD DETECTION IN ONLINE AUCTIONINGFRAUD DETECTION IN ONLINE AUCTIONING
FRAUD DETECTION IN ONLINE AUCTIONING
 
Csharp dot net
Csharp dot netCsharp dot net
Csharp dot net
 
Java Programming 100 Programming Challenges
Java Programming 100 Programming ChallengesJava Programming 100 Programming Challenges
Java Programming 100 Programming Challenges
 
E sampark with c#.net
E sampark with c#.netE sampark with c#.net
E sampark with c#.net
 
Java Semimar Slide (Cetpa)
Java Semimar Slide (Cetpa)Java Semimar Slide (Cetpa)
Java Semimar Slide (Cetpa)
 
Java Semimar Slide (Cetpa)
Java Semimar Slide (Cetpa)Java Semimar Slide (Cetpa)
Java Semimar Slide (Cetpa)
 
ASP.NET Session 1
ASP.NET Session 1ASP.NET Session 1
ASP.NET Session 1
 
Introduction to Java
Introduction to Java Introduction to Java
Introduction to Java
 
Programming with c#
Programming with c#Programming with c#
Programming with c#
 
Programming in c#
Programming in c#Programming in c#
Programming in c#
 
J2ee strutswithhibernate-140121221332-phpapp01
J2ee strutswithhibernate-140121221332-phpapp01J2ee strutswithhibernate-140121221332-phpapp01
J2ee strutswithhibernate-140121221332-phpapp01
 
Project report for final year project
Project report for final year projectProject report for final year project
Project report for final year project
 
Introduction to .net
Introduction to .netIntroduction to .net
Introduction to .net
 
Java Programming : introduction
Java Programming : introductionJava Programming : introduction
Java Programming : introduction
 
Java & J2EE Struts with Hibernate Framework
Java & J2EE Struts with Hibernate FrameworkJava & J2EE Struts with Hibernate Framework
Java & J2EE Struts with Hibernate Framework
 
.Net introduction by Quontra Solutions
.Net introduction by Quontra Solutions.Net introduction by Quontra Solutions
.Net introduction by Quontra Solutions
 
Industrial training
Industrial trainingIndustrial training
Industrial training
 
Java programming(unit 1)
Java programming(unit 1)Java programming(unit 1)
Java programming(unit 1)
 

Último

Practical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptx
Practical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptxPractical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptx
Practical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptxKatherine Villaluna
 
3.21.24 The Origins of Black Power.pptx
3.21.24  The Origins of Black Power.pptx3.21.24  The Origins of Black Power.pptx
3.21.24 The Origins of Black Power.pptxmary850239
 
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17Celine George
 
How to Add a many2many Relational Field in Odoo 17
How to Add a many2many Relational Field in Odoo 17How to Add a many2many Relational Field in Odoo 17
How to Add a many2many Relational Field in Odoo 17Celine George
 
Benefits & Challenges of Inclusive Education
Benefits & Challenges of Inclusive EducationBenefits & Challenges of Inclusive Education
Benefits & Challenges of Inclusive EducationMJDuyan
 
UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024
UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024
UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024UKCGE
 
2024.03.23 What do successful readers do - Sandy Millin for PARK.pptx
2024.03.23 What do successful readers do - Sandy Millin for PARK.pptx2024.03.23 What do successful readers do - Sandy Millin for PARK.pptx
2024.03.23 What do successful readers do - Sandy Millin for PARK.pptxSandy Millin
 
Maximizing Impact_ Nonprofit Website Planning, Budgeting, and Design.pdf
Maximizing Impact_ Nonprofit Website Planning, Budgeting, and Design.pdfMaximizing Impact_ Nonprofit Website Planning, Budgeting, and Design.pdf
Maximizing Impact_ Nonprofit Website Planning, Budgeting, and Design.pdfTechSoup
 
How to Solve Singleton Error in the Odoo 17
How to Solve Singleton Error in the  Odoo 17How to Solve Singleton Error in the  Odoo 17
How to Solve Singleton Error in the Odoo 17Celine George
 
In - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptx
In - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptxIn - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptx
In - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptxAditiChauhan701637
 
How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17
How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17
How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17Celine George
 
Education and training program in the hospital APR.pptx
Education and training program in the hospital APR.pptxEducation and training program in the hospital APR.pptx
Education and training program in the hospital APR.pptxraviapr7
 
Human-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming Classes
Human-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming ClassesHuman-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming Classes
Human-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming ClassesMohammad Hassany
 
How to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 Sales
How to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 SalesHow to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 Sales
How to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 SalesCeline George
 
Prescribed medication order and communication skills.pptx
Prescribed medication order and communication skills.pptxPrescribed medication order and communication skills.pptx
Prescribed medication order and communication skills.pptxraviapr7
 
Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...
Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...
Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...raviapr7
 
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptx
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptxUltra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptx
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptxDr. Asif Anas
 
Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.
Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.
Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.raviapr7
 
General views of Histopathology and step
General views of Histopathology and stepGeneral views of Histopathology and step
General views of Histopathology and stepobaje godwin sunday
 

Último (20)

Practical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptx
Practical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptxPractical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptx
Practical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptx
 
3.21.24 The Origins of Black Power.pptx
3.21.24  The Origins of Black Power.pptx3.21.24  The Origins of Black Power.pptx
3.21.24 The Origins of Black Power.pptx
 
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17
 
How to Add a many2many Relational Field in Odoo 17
How to Add a many2many Relational Field in Odoo 17How to Add a many2many Relational Field in Odoo 17
How to Add a many2many Relational Field in Odoo 17
 
Benefits & Challenges of Inclusive Education
Benefits & Challenges of Inclusive EducationBenefits & Challenges of Inclusive Education
Benefits & Challenges of Inclusive Education
 
UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024
UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024
UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024
 
2024.03.23 What do successful readers do - Sandy Millin for PARK.pptx
2024.03.23 What do successful readers do - Sandy Millin for PARK.pptx2024.03.23 What do successful readers do - Sandy Millin for PARK.pptx
2024.03.23 What do successful readers do - Sandy Millin for PARK.pptx
 
Maximizing Impact_ Nonprofit Website Planning, Budgeting, and Design.pdf
Maximizing Impact_ Nonprofit Website Planning, Budgeting, and Design.pdfMaximizing Impact_ Nonprofit Website Planning, Budgeting, and Design.pdf
Maximizing Impact_ Nonprofit Website Planning, Budgeting, and Design.pdf
 
Prelims of Kant get Marx 2.0: a general politics quiz
Prelims of Kant get Marx 2.0: a general politics quizPrelims of Kant get Marx 2.0: a general politics quiz
Prelims of Kant get Marx 2.0: a general politics quiz
 
How to Solve Singleton Error in the Odoo 17
How to Solve Singleton Error in the  Odoo 17How to Solve Singleton Error in the  Odoo 17
How to Solve Singleton Error in the Odoo 17
 
In - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptx
In - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptxIn - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptx
In - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptx
 
How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17
How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17
How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17
 
Education and training program in the hospital APR.pptx
Education and training program in the hospital APR.pptxEducation and training program in the hospital APR.pptx
Education and training program in the hospital APR.pptx
 
Human-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming Classes
Human-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming ClassesHuman-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming Classes
Human-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming Classes
 
How to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 Sales
How to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 SalesHow to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 Sales
How to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 Sales
 
Prescribed medication order and communication skills.pptx
Prescribed medication order and communication skills.pptxPrescribed medication order and communication skills.pptx
Prescribed medication order and communication skills.pptx
 
Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...
Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...
Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...
 
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptx
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptxUltra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptx
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptx
 
Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.
Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.
Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.
 
General views of Histopathology and step
General views of Histopathology and stepGeneral views of Histopathology and step
General views of Histopathology and step
 

Java vs .Net

  • 1. 1
  • 2. 2 SQL Server IIS on W2k Server .NET managed component ASP .NET Windows Client Browser
  • 4. ◦ Both multi-tiered, similar computing technologies ◦ Both support “standards” ◦ Both offer different tools & ways to achieve the same goal. ◦ A lot of parallelism can be seen. ◦ Very difficult to compare and qualify the comparison because each has its own advantages & disadvantages. 4
  • 5.  Java Pet Store is Sun‟s primary blueprint application for J2EE ◦ Source: http://java.sun.com/j2ee/blueprints ◦ Illustrates best coding practices for J2EE ◦ Ships as a sample application in IBM Websphere, Oracle Application Server 9i, Sun iPlanet, and BEA WebLogic  The .NET Petshop is a port of the J2EE Java Pet Store to .NET ◦ Source: http://www.gotdotnet.com/compare ◦ Implements the same functionality as Java Pet Store ◦ Illustrates best coding practices for .NET Framework  In the TMC Petshop Performance Case Study, The Middleware Company implemented both the Java Pet Store and the .Net Petshop. ◦ The J2EE version ran on two different application servers ◦ All versions used the same hardware and OS 5
  • 6. ◦ The Storefront presents the main user interface in a Web front-end. Customers use the Storefront to place orders for pets. ◦ The Order Processing Center (OPC) receives orders from the Storefront. ◦ The Supplier fulfills orders from the OPC from inventory and invoices the OPC. ◦ The Admin presents the administrator interface in a JFC/Swing front-end. Administrators use the Admin to examine pending orders and approve or deny them. 6
  • 7. 7
  • 8. 8 14000 7500 9000 5000 2500 15500 11500 Java Pet Store Lines of Code Required User Interface 4,410 Data TierMiddle Tier 2,865 .NET Petshop 14,273 5,891 ConfigurationTotal Lines of Code 710 5,404 761 412 74 2,566
  • 9. 9
  • 10. 10
  • 11. ◦ Based on Oracle-published data for tuned version of Java Pet Store ◦ Using Oracle‟s test scripts from their “9i App Server Challenge” ◦ Run on equivalent hardware 11 1.0 0 0 User Load Level ResponseTime(Seconds) 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 2750 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.8 2800% Better performance Supporting 6 times more users
  • 12.  Microsoft concludes: ".NET is 28 times faster than J2EE" ◦ Because: ◦ “Java PetShop” is Sun‟s “best practice” example ◦ Numbers compared with published Oracle results ◦ Identical functionality, all code published and documented  Can we believe the raw numbers? Yes! ◦ Why? Microsoft delivers full docs on the entire scenario  But 28 times really? 12
  • 13.  Java PetShop: J2EE blueprint application ◦ Built by Sun to show "best practice" design ◦ Implementation by TMC missed quite a few optimizations  .NET PetShop ◦ Built by TMC (with help from MS) with different design  Plain classes instead of container managed components  Middle tier moved into ASP.NET  Using stored procedures instead of ad-hoc SQL  Uses server-side caching of ASP.NET  Many performance optimizations applied  Most Java devotees find this highly unfair 13
  • 14.  Re-implementation of J2EE version ◦ 17 times performance increase ◦ Second version showed some J2EE implementation equal .Net ◦ Second version is a testimony to performance tuning 14
  • 15.  It is very difficult to make such comparisons  That .Net has gained maturity extremely fast  That the two frameworks are very similar  The Devil is in the detail 15 So let‟s look at some details
  • 16. 16 VBC++C#PerlPython… VisualStudio.net Win32 MSMQ, COM+, IIS, WMI, AD, ADAM, Indexing, UDDI, etc. CLR Base Class Library ADO.NET ASP.Net P&P blocks Win32, Unix, Linux JMS Apache J2EE App Servers Websphere, Weblogic, Tomcat, etc. Java runtime J2EE Class Library Third party extensions JDBC Servlets JSP Struts Extensions: Phoenix, Tiles, Java Faces Enterprise solutions BEAWeblogicWebshpereStudioEclipse… Java
  • 17. ◦ C# is an object oriented language of the C++/Java flavor ◦ Syntax similar to Java and C/C++. ◦ Quite an impressive design and care for details ◦ Java developers will feel comfortable  most of the time and frustrated when things are different ◦ MS says: “C# combines the power of VC++ with the ease of usage of VB”  Not really true:  C# is really powerful BUT  It is not easy to learn for non C++/Java programmers ◦ It is the language to learn if you are serious about .NET! 17
  • 18. // This is a comment in Java code class HelloWorld{ public static void main(String[] args){ for(int i= 1; i<= 100; i++) System.out.println("Hello!"); } } // This is a comment in C# using System; class HelloWorld{ static void Main(){ for(int i=1; i<=100; i++) Console.WriteLine("Hello"); } } } 18
  • 19.  Java ◦ int, float, double, etc. ◦ Allocated on stack ◦ Not an Object ◦ Not extensible  C# ◦ int, float, double, etc. ◦ structs ◦ Allocated on stack ◦ Inherited from object class ◦ structs can implement interfaces ◦ Cannot inherit from another class 19 // C# struct Point { int x; int y; Point(int x, int y) { this.x = x; this.y = y; } }
  • 20.  Java ◦ All methods are implicitly virtual  C# ◦ Explicitly use „virtual‟ and „override‟ keywords 20 class B { public void foo() { } } class D extends B { public void foo() { } } // D’s foo() overrides B’s foo() class B { public virtual void foo() { } } class D:B { public override void foo() { } } // D’s foo() overrides B’s foo()
  • 21.  Java ◦ C++-style try/catch blocks ◦ finally– action done even after an exception is caught ◦ throws – methods identify what exceptions they throw  C# ◦ C++-style try/catch blocks ◦ finally – same as Java ◦ Does not support throws clause 21 // Java – throws an IOException public void myFunc(int a) throws IOException { // Work… } // Java and C# try { // Stuff… } catch { // Ack! } finally { // Always! }
  • 22. 22
  • 23. 23
  • 24. 24
  • 25. 25 • No automatic fall-through from one case block to the next • Strongly-typed enums • By reference calls are explicit at caller AND callee • Method overrides are explicit • Supports versioning • Structs (value types) • Integrated support for properties and events • Can still use pointers with RAD language • Can share data and use functionality with components written in many different languages
  • 26. 26 C# Managed C/C++ Lots of other Languages VB .Net CLR CTS GC Security Runtime Services MSIL Windows OS Java JRE (JVM) GC Security Runtime Services Byte Codes Mac Unix LinuxWin Both are „middle layers‟ between an intermediate language & the underlying OS
  • 27.  ECMA standardisation ◦ ECMA 334 and 335  The Mono Project ◦ Shared Source Common Language Runtime ◦ CLI, C# and Jscript ◦ FreeBSD and Windows implementations ◦ Linux port underway  DOT GNU project ◦ Portable .Net implementation ◦ C# for both CIL and JVM 27
  • 28. ◦ JVM designed for platform independence  Single language: Java (?)  A separate JVM for each OS & device ◦ CLR designed for language independence  Multiple languages for development  C++, VB, C#, (J#)  APL, COBOL, Eiffel, Forth, Fortran, Haskel, SML, Mercury, Mond rian, Oberon, Pascal, Perl, Python, RPG, Scheme, SmallScript, …  Impressive usage of formal methods and programming language research during development  Impressive extensions for generics and support for functional languages underway  Underlying OS: Windows (?) 28
  • 29.  Java byte code (or JVML) is the low-level language of the JVM.  MSIL (or CIL or IL) is the low-level language of the .NET Common Language Runtime (CLR).  Superficially, the two languages look very similar.  One difference is that MSIL is designed only for JIT compilation.  The generic add instruction would require an interpreter to track the data type of the top of stack element, which would be prohibitively expensive. 29 JVML: iload 1 iload 2 iadd istore 3 MSIL: ldloc.1 ldloc.2 add stloc.3
  • 30. 30 JVM CLR Managed execution environment X X Garbage Collection X X Metadata and Bytecode X X Platform- abstraction class library X X Runtime-level security X X Runs across hardware platforms X ?
  • 31.  J2EE (1.5) preview of 26.4.2004 ◦ Focus on ease of development  Generics and metadata as in J2SE 1.5 (more like C#)  Java Studio Creator tool (in beta from April 2004) (more like Visual Studio .Net) ◦ Timeframe  To be discussed at JavaOne in June  Finalized in approximately one year ◦ IBM push for truly open source Java ◦ Others hesitate (even Open Source JBoss) 31
  • 32.  Web Services are fine as n-tier applications with UI provided through browser, but …  On mobile devices WAP hasn‟t really caught on  Even iMode hasn‟t caught on in Europe  Renewed Thin/Thick client discussion  Java applications on Mobile devices are reasonably successful  Now Microsoft is moving fast into the field with .Net Compact Framework 32
  • 34. 34
  • 35.  Mobile device ◦ Software infrastructure, hardware requirements  Communication technology ◦ On-/Offline scenario ◦ Wireless Wide Area Networks/ Wireless Local Area Networks ◦ Communication protocol  Application architecture scenario ◦ Thin/fat client  Data management ◦ Synchronisation ◦ On-/offline capabilities  Security issues ◦ Dangers for mobile devices ◦ Threats of communication technology ◦ Danger of exposing enterprise data 35
  • 36.  Java 2 Micro Edition (J2ME) is not ONE Java edition  An J2ME compliant application consists of ◦ Configuration ◦ Profile (e.g. Personal, Mobile Information Device Profile (MIDP)) ◦ Application code ◦ Vendor specific UI  3 Contenders to compare ◦ Java 2 Micro Edition – Connected Device Configuration (CDC) ◦ Java 2 Micro Edition – Connected Limited Device Configuration (CLDC) ◦ Microsoft .NET Compact Framework 36 The Java vs. Net discussion goes mobile
  • 37.  Group of Master Level Students (Hovedfag) ◦ Bjørn D. Rasmussen ◦ Casper S. Jensen ◦ Jimmy Nielsen ◦ Lasse Jensen  Collaboration with DEIF  Project Goals ◦ Build end-to-end mobile client, wireless, webservices based application with back-end interface to SCADA ◦ In Java (J2ME/J2EE) and in .Net ◦ Compare the two solutions on a set of criteria 37
  • 38. Objective measurements  Lines of code  Development tools  Documentation  Infrastructure  Performance  Architectural pattern  Security  Price  Development time Subjective measurements  Developer satisfaction  End-user satisfaction 38
  • 39. 39
  • 40. 40
  • 41.  Server-side is well supported by both Java and .NET IDEs  On the client-side .NET IDEs benefit from the fact that .NET CF is so close to .NET (With Java there are separate IDEs for desktop and mobile application development)  Compatibility problems between Java vendors  Java IDEs are slow!  C# is a richer/more complex language than Java  Both Java and .NET have well documented API  Web service documentation ◦ .NET - MSDN ◦ Java – Google  Support for encryption of web services ◦ .Net CF: HTTPS and SOAP extensions 41
  • 42.  Server-side web service performance study with: ◦ Microsoft Application Server (v. 5.1) ◦ Sun ONE Application Server (v. 7.0)  Tested for: ◦ Throughput ◦ Failure rate ◦ Average response time 42
  • 43. 43
  • 44. 44
  • 45. 45
  • 46.  Slow start-up when developing in Java ◦ Jungle of web service implementations ◦ IDE incompatibility problems  Emulators  kSOAP  Trouble-free implementation in .NET 46
  • 47.  Developer satisfaction ◦ VS.NET integrates web service and mobile application development far better than any Java IDE ◦ A subset of an API is a better solution for mobile devices instead of an entirely new API  End-user satisfaction ◦ DEIF would choose a .NET based solution since startup time is very important ◦ DEIF only needs a limited number of IDE licenses ◦ Extra price for a SmartPhone 2003 is insignificant compared to the value it gives ◦ The SmartPhone 2003 is more ”fancy” than the Java phones 47
  • 48.  We see .NET as a better designed framework because: ◦ it eliminates the language barrier while also being platform independent ◦ it makes only little distinction between desktop and mobile application development  Sun‟s application server performance is very poor compared to IIS.  License fees for a Java based solution are cheaper but .NET might catch up when considering development time  We tried a combined .NET and Java solution but this has shown to be very troublesome! 48
  • 49.  The two worlds are becoming more and more similar ◦ But it seems that you have to work harder in Java than in .Net ◦ .Net is currently driving technology transfer from Research to Product  Windows generation at University now  Watch-out in the mobile world  Vodafone to offer Microsoft Smart phones ◦ http://msmobiles.com/news.php/2504.html ◦ Fed-up with Nokia promoting own brand, rather than operator brand 49
  • 50.  It is very difficult to make such comparisons  That .Net has gained maturity extremely fast  That the two frameworks are very similar  You will not be sacked for choosing the right J2EE application server ;-)  The Devil is in the detail ◦ C# is not Java ◦ ADO.NET is not JDBC ◦ CLR is not JVM ◦ CF.Net smartphones are very different from Java Smartphones 50
  • 51.  The ultimate choice usually depends not on technical superiority, but on: ◦ cultural/”religious”/political preferences ◦ Skill set of your developers ◦ Customer preference ◦ Vendor relations 51
  • 52.  The two frameworks are becoming more and more alike  However: ◦ .Net is Microsoft‟s core strategy  .Net will be part of OS in the next generation of Windows  Lot‟s of innovation in Longhorn – Avalon, indogo, WinFS ◦ Is Java in Sun‟s core strategy?  Java 1.5 SE is very close to C# 2.0/.Net CLR  Sun Java Studio Creator somewhat close to VS.Net  Some talk of JVM as multi-language platform, but not really so far …  Sun in “Java as Open Source” battle with IBM 52
  • 53. 53 Sun vs. Microsoft Stock Prices
  • 54. 54 Choosing between Java and .Net • You are most likely to be developing in both environments for the foreseeable future – Gartner Group: 30+% of all enterprise applications will have both J2EE and .Net code – Often IIS in front of J2EE infrastructure – Interoperability issues • Web Services (often too slow or doesn‟t support …) • J2EE/.Net bridge (IL -> JBC or JBC ->IL) • Look out for “The third way” – Linux, Apache, MySQL, PhP, … • Look out for disruptive technologies – It only takes one guy to get the right idea – and a small team to implement a completely new platform – and One large company to productise it – or a lot of grassroots …