The connected society reverses the paradigm according to which companies are offer its products to customers, leaving it to users to make suggestions. What's the point now have the loyalty programs offered by companies?

1. The enigma of l o y a l t y

2. The connected society reverses the paradigm according to which companies are aproporre its
products to customers, leaving it to users to make suggestions.
What's the point now have the loyalty programs
offered by companies?

3. In any nonlinear dynamic system such as network, diversity is a value, people differ in their
nature, this also means that the changes made by individual people do not have the same
features and do not cause the same changes
Il chance and Necessity transform mode
function loyalty by changing the value signifier?

4. Today, in this type of economy the value is always less generated by the sale and purchase of
products, and increasingly through a dynamic system of information, services, experiences and
solutions. We need to create products and solutions based on social needs and collective
aspirations, which are beneficial to the community as well as individuals
The language has changed, the concept of gain
to the concept of saving ethical?

5. Awards unreachable ...
For those who see us move in packs, to consume the planet and kill each other, human
beings may seem all, unless one intelligent community. The thesis of the existence of a
collective intelligence emerges from the observation and the small groups, and of the
great civilizations, but companies often do not allow for this. In a loyalty program
generally focus, in addition to the discount, the collection points daun catalog that
allows you to purchase different types of products, but if you read the catalog you will
find that the value of these products linked to the value of the points is nothing short of
absurd . An example: a pot will be worth 3,000 points and if these points are indicated
with a value of € 1 = 1point a, you know well that with the same real value I buy a car. If
you ask explanations will give economic Justification elaborate, in fact there is
something not clear, but no one will give full answers. It seems that for all of
these"companies" the user is not able to make sensible economic considerations, or
worse yet that we are not equipped with intelligence.

6. The dream expanded ...
The construction of a Dream, based If then you will deepen further the business
on the desires of status is in decay is model you will find it does not exist, why
the tool proposed by some "business" should I join a community that does not have
that the term social shopping a real product, but buys it from international
damage disappointments of various platforms (such Zanox Trade Double etc..), It
kinds (anchee conomiche) to their would be more interesting to directly use these
affiliati.Nella looking for false platforms without brokerage costs and then
innovations, some companies have have a further real savings? In short, it is a false
designed and built an abstract illusion that we are proposing, but today social
model of business applied to the media can undermine the false existing
network in which you can not only business models, which are based only on the
save money, but also earn. If you idea of the big "dreams of business." The Social
think more carefully about this Business is not a trend is a modus operandi,
business model, there is a strong which turned deep consumer culture, and is
discrepancy between the two transforming their relationship with the
​
values of savings and gain when companies-products-services, is changing the
used simultaneously. That someone way the patterns of use of this instrument
will gain on you and you will earn on under the revised needs of consumers, but
someone, but then where he is the beware of false promises that the web end up
real savings? very early to be hoaxes-lies.

7. The reputation paid ...
In today's society you must be, as well as creative and flexible, highly credible, that
have a system of reputazionee guarantees adequate to dialogue is that out. Some
companies, conscious of a lack of credible business model, looking to purchase
reputation by co-branding. That is, through the co-operation with other partners who
have real products or services, to at least get a reputation as a "company making the
distribution" of unique products offered at great prices. Then arise various examples of
coalition-program, linked to one or more reltà territorial. If they were designed in an
innovative way may also work, but are not attached to a model "relational", where
information is exchanged with their customers, but made only as a "model" for profit, in
which the unsuspecting partner is involved, and in spite of long-term results in a loss of
image and reputation by sharing data unreliable. Rather than representing and look for
new business models for a company different from the rest, giving a privileged role in
the dialogue with customers, in order to engage in an enterprise, to become part of the
national and international networks, to create value, try to represent only themselves,
perhaps in an optical acquisition of external funding that can be used for their needs. If
we approfodite lanalisi you will find that there is not even an internal organization
based on shared among all employees, to create innovations that improve the
processes of purchasing and consumption / use of products and services by customers,
but only a pyramidal system indoors, where there is only the ignorant hierarchy of
processes, perhaps badly copied by other companies.

8. Choose your paper...

9. I choose the innovation...
Unfortunately it is now a widespread prejudice that stupidity is that intelligence is simple
and complicated. The real genius and great quality, are the ability to transform a
complex problem into a simple solution. When intelligence is proposed in an intricate
way (complicated), or difficult to understand, it means that it is immature. Part of the
problem that we ruin your life are the accumulation dicomplicazioni useless. "It
'following this principle that I discover what are the right choices, certainly not those
who are reborn from fraudulent companies, and even those in which the user, as reality
human, is not at the center of the business model of the company. It is not copying
without the knowledge that you can find innovations or a business model which
functions

10. m.paglioli@gmail.com
Thankyou
SLIDE FLICKR user name:MAITJÜRIADO-STÉFAN-
AJITH-DARRRENHESTE-EKURVINE-ETGEEK
AGAHRAN-DELPHWYN R. Buckminster Fuller,
Anne Griswold Tyng, Gerry McGovern, Kevin
Kelly, AdrianoOlivetti, Gerry Mc Govern, John
Naisbitt, Maria Bottero, Smari Mc Carthy,
McLuhan,J.Gleick, George Santayana,
Jacques Monod, Muhammmad Yunus, Italo
Calvino, E.H. Gombrich, Diego Perugini,
Giampiero Poli, Helghe Tenno, Bruce Sterling,
Justen Lee,Bruno Munari, Josephine Green,
Promotions Italia.
copywright- marco paglioli