Mais conteúdo relacionado Semelhante a Precise Patient Registries: The Foundation for Clinical Research & Population Health Management (20) Mais de Health Catalyst (20) Precise Patient Registries: The Foundation for Clinical Research & Population Health Management1. Precise Patient Registries:
The Foundation for Clinical Research &
Population Health Management
© 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com Creative Commons Copyright
© 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Dale Sanders, November 2014
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
2. © 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
Agenda
• Assertions and criticisms of the current state
• What is a patient registry?
• History and definitions
• What should we be doing differently?
• Designing precise registries
• An example from our registry work at
Northwestern University
• Nitty Gritty data details
3. © 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Acknowledgements & Thanks
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
• Steve Barlow
• Cessily Johnson
• Darren Kaiser
• Anita Parisot
• Tracy Vayo
4. © 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
Poll Question
Have you ever been directly involved in the design
and development of a patient registry?
Yes
No
5. Assertion #1
Without precise definitions and registries of patient types,
you can’t have…
• Precise clinical research
© 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
• Precise comparisons across the industry
• Precise financial and risk management
• Precise, personalized healthcare
• Predictable clinical outcomes
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
6. © 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
Assertion #2
• We can’t keep building disease registries at each
organization, from scratch
• It takes too long, it’s too expensive, it’s not
standardized to support disease reporting,
surveillance, and comparative medicine
• Federal involvement has helped, but projects are
moving too slowly
7. © 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Healthcare Analytics Adoption Model
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
Level 8 Personalized Medicine
& Prescriptive Analytics
Tailoring patient care based on population outcomes and
genetic data. Fee-for-quality rewards health maintenance.
Level 7 Clinical Risk Intervention
& Predictive Analytics
Organizational processes for intervention are supported
with predictive risk models. Fee-for-quality includes fixed
per capita payment.
Level 6 Population Health Management
& Suggestive Analytics
Tailoring patient care based upon population metrics. Fee-for-
quality includes bundled per case payment.
Level 5 Waste & Care Variability Reduction
Reducing variability in care processes. Focusing on
internal optimization and waste reduction.
Level 4 Automated External Reporting
Efficient, consistent production of reports & adaptability to
changing requirements.
Level 3 Automated Internal Reporting
Efficient, consistent production of reports & widespread
availability in the organization.
Level 2 Standardized Vocabulary
& Patient Registries
Relating and organizing the core data content.
Level 1 Enterprise Data Warehouse Collecting and integrating the core data content.
Level 0 Fragmented Point Solutions
Inefficient, inconsistent versions of the truth. Cumbersome
internal and external reporting.
8. © 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Achieving High Resolution Medicine
It starts with precise registries
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
9. Computer Applications used to capture,
manage, and provide information on specific
conditions to support organized care
management of patients with chronic disease.”
— ”Using Computerized Registries in Chronic Disease Care”
California Healthcare Foundation and First Consulting Group, 2004
© 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Patient Registry Definitions
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
10. A patient registry is an organized
system that uses observational study
methods to collect uniform data (clinical
and other) to evaluate specified
outcomes for a population defined by a
particular disease, condition, or
exposure and that serves one or more
predetermined scientific, clinical, or
policy purposes.”
© 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
AHRQ’s Patient Registry Definition
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
11. The National Committee on Vital and
Health Statistics describes registries used
for a broad range of purposes in public
health and medicine as "an organized
system for the collection, storage, retrieval,
analysis, and dissemination of information
on individual persons who have either a
particular disease, a condition (e.g., a risk
factor) that predisposes [them] to the
occurrence of a health-related event, or
prior exposure to substances (or
circumstances) known or suspected to
cause adverse health effects."
© 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
AHRQ’s Patient Registry Definition
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
12. A database designed to store and analyze
information about the occurrence and
incidence of a particular disease, procedure,
event, device, or medication and for which, the
inclusion criteria are defined in such a manner
that minimizes variability and maximizes
precision of inclusion within the cohort.”
— Dale Sanders, Northwestern University
© 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Patient Registry Definitions
Medical Informatics Faculty, 2005
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
13. 1973: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)
Pioneered by GroupHealth of Puget Sound in the early
1980s for diseases other than cancer
© 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
History of Patient Registries
Historically, the term implies stand-alone, specialized
products and clinical databases
Long precedence of use and effectiveness in cancer
1926: First cancer registry at Yale-New Haven hospital
1935: First state, centralized cancer registry in Connecticut
program of National Cancer Institute, first national cancer
registry
1993: Most states pass laws requiring cancer registries
“Clinically related information system”
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
14. • Intermountain, 1999: 18 months to achieve consensus
• Northwestern, 2005: 6 months to achieve consensus,
• Cayman Islands, 2009: 6 weeks to achieve consensus,
borrowing from Intermountain, Northwestern, and BMJ
© 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
What’s a Diabetic Patient?
How do we define a “diabetic” patient with data?
borrowing from Intermountain and other “evidence
based” sources
• Medicare Shared Savings and HEDIS: 54 ICDs
• Meaningful Use: 43 ICDs
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
15. © 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Sources of “Standard”
Registry Definitions
There is growing convergence, but still lots of disagreement
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
HEDIS/NCQA
Medicare Shared Savings
NLM Value Set Authority Center
Meaningful Use
NQF
Specialty Groups and Journals
OECD
WHO
And others…!
16. © 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics 16
17. © 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Precise Patient Registries Example
Follow Us on Twitter 1 7#TimeforAnalytics
Asthma
Supplemental
ICD9 (38,250)
Medications
(72,581)
Problem
List
(22,955)
ICD9 493.XX
(29,805)
Additional
Potential Rules
(101,389)
17
18. © 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics 18
19. "It may be that a 'free-text' entry was added to the
record, but unless it is coded in electronically, the
patient has not been included in the diabetes register
and cannot therefore benefit from the structured care
that depends on such inclusion." -- Dr. Tim Holt
© 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Medscape Summary of Article
• 11.5 million patient records
• 9000 primary-care clinics across the United
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
States
• 5.4% of those likely to have diabetes in the
databases were undiagnosed
• Undiagnosed proportion rose to 12% to 16% in
"hot spots," including Arizona, North Dakota,
Minnesota, South Carolina, and Indiana
• Patients without an ICD for diabetes received
worse care, had worse outcomes
19
20. © 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Types of Registries, Not Necessarily
Disease Oriented
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
Product Registries
● Patients exposed to a health care product, such as a drug or a
device
Health Services Registries
● Patients by clinical encounters such as
‒ Office visits
‒ Hospitalizations
‒ Procedures
‒ Full episodes of care
Referring Physician Registry
● Facilitates coordination of care
Primary Care Physician Registry
● Facilitates coordination of care
21. ● Facilitates analysis for Patient Relationship Management (PRM)
● Can drive reminders for research and standards of care protocols
© 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
More Types of Registries
Scheduling Events Registry
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
Mortality registry
● An important thing to know about your patients
Research Patient Registry
● Clinical Trials
● Consent
Disease or Condition Registries
● Disease or condition registries use the state of a particular disease or
condition as the inclusion criterion.
Combinations
22. © 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Innumerable Uses & Benefits
Registries
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
How well am I
managing
diseases?
Who else is
treating
patients like
this?
How does
my drug
perform in
disease
prevention,
progression,
and cure?
How is this
disease
expressed in the
genome?
How do I
analyze patient
trends and
outcomes for a
disease?
How do I know
which
drug/procedure
works best for me?
Who else matches
my specific profile
for disease,
medication,
procedure, or
device… and can I
interact with them?
23. Patients exist in one of three states, relative
to a patient registry
The patient is
a member of a
particular
registry; i.e.,
they fit the
inclusion
criteria
© 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
On Registry
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
23
Patient was once
a member of a
registry and fit the
inclusion criteria,
but is now
excluded. The
exclusion could be
“disease free.”
Disease
Registry
Off Registry
At Risk
The patient fits the
profile that could lead
to inclusion on the
registry, but does not
yet meet the formal
inclusion criteria, e.g.
obesity as a precursor
to membership on the
diabetes and or
hypertension registry.
24. © 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics 24
25. © 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Patient Registry Engine
* DISEASE MANAGEMENT
* OUTCOMES ANALYSIS
* RESEARCH
* P4P REPORTING
* CLINICAL TRIALS ENROLLMENT
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
SCHEDULING
REGISTRATION
PATH
TUMOR REG
LAB RESULTS
MEDICATIONS
ICD9 CODES
CPT CODES
CLINICAL OBS
PROBLEM
LIST
PATIENT
VALIDATION
CLINICIAN
VALIDATION
DISEASE
REGISTRY
MORTALITY
INCLUSION
CRITERIA &
STRUCTURED
EXCLUSION
CODES
PATIENT
PROVIDER
RELATIONSHIP
RAD RESULTS
COSTS &
REIMBURSEMENT
DATA
CARDIOLOGY
IMAGING
How do we define a particular disease?
Who has the disease?
What is their demographic profile?
Are we managing these patients according to accepted best
protocols?
Which patients had the best outcomes and why?
Where is the optimal point of cost vs. outcome?
26. The Healthcare Process vs. Supportive
Data Sources
© 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Diagnostic systems
Lab System
Radiology
Imaging
Pathology
Cardiology
Others
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
Diagnosis
Registration &
Scheduling
Patient
Perception
Orders &
Procedures
Results &
Outcomes
Billing &
Accounts
Receivable
Claims
Processing
Encounter
Documentation
ADT System
Master Patient Index
Pharmacy Electronic
Medical Record
Results Surveys
Billing and AR
System
Claims Processing
System
Patient data lies in many
disparate sources
27. Geometrically More Complex In Accountable
Care and Most IDNs
A Data Warehouse Solves the Data Disparity Problem
© 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
EDW
A single data perspective
on the patient care process
Physician Office X
Hospital Y Physician Office Z
28. © 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
A well designed data warehouse can be the platform that feeds
many of these registries, and more, in an automated fashion
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
29. Mini-Case Study From
Northwestern University Medicine,
2006
© 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
© 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
30. ‒ HIV
‒ Hodgkin's Disease
– Hypertension
– Lower back pain
– Systemic Lupus
– Macular degeneration
– Major depression
– Migraines
– MRSA/VRE
– Multiple myeloma
– Myelodysplastic syndrome & acute leukemia
– Myocardial infarction
– Obesity
– Osteoporosis
– Ovarian cancer
– Prostate cancer
– Rett Syndrome
– Rheumatoid Arthritis
– Scleroderma
– Sickle Cell
– Upper respiratory infection (3-18 years)
– Urinary incontinence (women over 65)
– Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis
© 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Target Disease Registries*
‒ Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
‒ Alzheimer's
‒ Asthma
‒ Breast cancer
‒ Cataracts
‒ Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
‒ Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
‒ Colorectal cancer
‒ Community acquired bacterial pneumonia
‒ Coronary artery bypass graft
‒ Coronary artery disease
‒ Coumadin management
‒ Diabetes
‒ End stage renal
‒ Gastro esophageal reflux disease
‒ Glaucoma
‒ Heart failure
‒ Hemophilia
‒ Stroke (Hemorrhagic and/or Ischemic)
‒ High risk pregnancy
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
*Northwestern
University Medicine,
2006
31. • Inclusion codes based entirely on ICD9, which was a
good place to start, but not specific enough
© 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Inclusion & Exclusion for Heart Failure
Clinical Study
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
31
● Heart failure codes for study inclusion
‒ 398.91, 402.01, 402.11, 402.91, 404.01, 404.03, 404.11, 404.13, 404.91, 404.93, 428.xx
● Exclusion criteria for beta blocker use†
‒ Heart block, second or third degree: 426.0, 426.12, 426.13, 426.7
‒ Bradycardia: 427.81, 427.89, 337.0
‒ Hypotension: 458.xx
‒ Asthma, COPD: see above
‒ Alzheimer's disease: 331.0
‒ Metastatic cancer: 196.2, 196.3, 196.5, 196.9, 197.3, 197.7, 198.1, 198.81, 198.82,
199.0, 259.2, 363.14, 785.6, V23.5-V23.9
● † Exclusion criteria were only assessed for patients who did not have a medication
prescribed; thus, if a patient was prescribed a medication but had an exclusion criteria, the
patient was included in the numerator and the denominator of the performance measure. If
a patient was not prescribed a medication and met one or more of the exclusion criteria, the
patient was removed from both the numerator and the denominator.
Acknowledgements to Dr. David Baker, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
32. Disease Registry “Exclusions”
Our first attempts at adjusting the numerator
The industry will need standard vocabularies for excluding patients
Removing patients from the registry whose data would otherwise
“Why should this patient be excluded from this registry, even though
they appear to meet the inclusion criteria?”
© 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
skew the data profile of the cohort
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
On Registry
Disease Registry
Off Registry
At Risk
Patient has a conflicting clinical condition
Patient has a conflicting genetic condition
Patient is deceased
Patient is no long under the care of this facility or
physician
33. Our View On “Exclusion” Evolved
Excluding patients might be a bad idea in many situations
At Northwestern (2007-2009), we found that 30% of patients fell into one
or more of these categories:
© 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Not all patients in a registry can functionally participate in a protocol, but
you can’t just exclude and ignore them. You still have to treat them and
their data is critical to understanding the disease or condition.
• Cognitive inability
• Economic inability
• Physical inability
• Geographic inability
• Religious beliefs
• Contraindications to the protocol
• Voluntarily non-compliant
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
33
34. © 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics 34
35. Exam
History
Diagnosis
Code
© 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Diabetes Registry Data Model
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
Diabetes
Patient
35
Typical Analyses Use Cases
• How many diabetic patients do I have?
• When was their result for each HA1C, LDL, Foot Exam,
Eye Exam over last 2 years?
• What are all their medications and how long have they
been taking each?
• What was addressed at each of their visits for the last 2
years?
• Which doctors have they seen and why?
• How many admissions have they had and why?
• What co-morbid conditions are present?
• Which interventions (diet, exercise, medications) are
having the biggest impact on LDL, HA1C scores?
Procedure
History
Vital Signs
History
Current Lab
Result
Lab Result
History
Office
Visit
Exam
Type
Diagnosis
History
Procedure
Code
Lab Type
This data model applies to virtually all
disease registries. Just change the name
of the central table.
36. © 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Building The Diabetes Registry
diabetes (registries_dm)
mrd_pt_id int
birth_dt datetime
death_dt datetime
gender_cd varchar(20)
problem_list_diabetes... int
encntrs_diabetes_dx_... int
orders_diabetes_dx_n... int
meds_diabetes_dx_num int
last_hba1c_val float
last_hba1c_dts datetime
max_hba1c_val float
max_hba1c_dts datetime
min_hba1c_val float
min_hba1c_dts datetime
tobacco_user_flg varchar(50)
alcohol_user_flg varchar(50)
last_encntr_dts datetime
last_bmi_val decimal(18, 2)
last_height_val varchar(50)
last_weight_val varchar(50)
data_thru_dts datetime
meta_orignl_load_dts datetime
meta_update_dts datetime
meta_load_exectn_guid uniqueidentifier
ETL Package
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
Column Name Data Type Allow Nulls
Epic-Clarity
Problem List
Orders
Encounters
Cerner
Problem List
Orders
Encounters
IDX
CPT’s Billed
Billing Diagnosis
Inclusion
and
Exclusion
Criteria
for
Specific
Disease
Registry
37. © 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Data Quality & The Disease Registry
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
38. © 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Investigating Bad Data
3345 kg = 7359 lbs
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
Hello, CNN?
39. “Recommend next HbA1C testing at 90 days because patient is not at
© 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Closed Loop Analytics
Ideally, disease registry information should be available at point of care
Guideline-based intervals for tests, follow-ups, referrals
Interventions that are overdue
goal for glucose control.”
How do you implement this in Epic?
Invoke web services within Epic programming points to display
information inside Epic
Invoke external web solutions within Hyperspace
Write data back in epic
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
FYI Flags
CUIs
Health Maintenance Topics
Etc.
40. © 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
c
41. © 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Geisinger &
Cleveland Clinic
Make It Commercially
Available
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
42. Nitty Gritty Data Details
© 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
© 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
Thank you, Tracy Vayo
43. Does your organization have a patient registry data
© 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Poll Question
governance and stewardship process?
• Yes and it’s very active
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
• Yes, somewhat
• No, but we are talking about it
• No, not at all
• I’m not part of an organization that manages
patient registries
43
44. © 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
c
Not
exhaustive; for
illustrative
purposes only
45. © 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
c
Diabetes,
continued
46. © 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
c
Not
exhaustive; for
illustrative
purposes only
47. © 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
c
Not
exhaustive; for
illustrative
purposes only
48. © 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
c
Sepsis,
continued
49. vendor space, but most vendors are stuck on ICD codes,
only
© 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
In Conclusion
• Precise registries are required for precise, high
resolution healthcare
• So much of what we do depends on registries and the
dependence is growing
• Precise registries are tough to build
• We can’t afford to keep building them from scratch
• Federal efforts at standardization are moving slowly
• Precise registries are a commercial differentiator in the
• For questions and follow-up, please contact me
• dale.sanders@healthcatalyst.com
• @drsanders
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics
50. Upcoming Educational Opportunities
A Health Catalyst Overview: An Introduction to Healthcare Data
Warehousing and Analytics
Date: November 20, 1-2pm, EST
Presenter: Vice President Jared Crapo & Senior Solutions Consultant Sriraman Rajamani
http://www.healthcatalyst.com/knowledge-center/webinars-presentations
© 2014 Health Catalyst
www.healthcatalyst.com
Thank You
Follow Us on Twitter #TimeforAnalytics