Is 70:20:10 fact or myth? We couldn't find any recent supporting research, and we wanted to learn more about these magic numbers. What we found might just surprise you: in reality, leaders spend their time on--and prefer--a different ratio. See how leaders actually spend their time, and the ratio that proves most effective. For a full list of findings from the Global Leadership Forecast 2014|2015, visit www.ddiworld.com/glf2014.

2. Get R
Bump
The most com
ratio—70 repr
and 10, learnin
decades-old re
value of learni
a near-univers
and receive de
that they never
These disconn
research—pro
test with over
time leaders sp
significantly em
de-emphasizin
identified a rat
very little by le
similar ratio of
Next, we want
highest-quality
exceed their pe
leaders themse
strongly assoc
leaders actuall
spend on leade
spend. Austral
hours/month n
development.
additional lear
much more tim
From all these
misrepresents
organizations w
themselves pre
ratio—emphas
integration. Al
them so they c
value.
id of t
per Sti
mmon piece of w
resents learning
ng from formal
esearch that ask
ing types. It ha
al planning edi
evelopment. Ev
r intended it to
nects—along w
ompted us to fin
13,000 of toda
pend on learnin
mphasizes form
ng on-the-job le
tio of 55:25:20
eader level. Au
f 57:26:17.
ted to know wh
y leader develo
eers in leadersh
elves. The resu
iated with high
ly spend their ti
ership developm
lian and New Z
now, but would
When asked w
rning hours, the
me in formal le
e data we concl
leaders’ reality
with the highes
efer. Even mor
sizes the separa
llowing learnin
can build on on
* McCall, M.W
the Old
cker
wisdom on how
g that occurs on
l development.
ked leaders to lo
s evolved to so
ict, looking for
ven the ratio’s o
be used as the
with not a single
nd out if this ra
ay’s leaders. As
ng has a very d
mal learning an
earning. Surpri
0 of actual learn
ustralian and N
hat ratio is used
opment. To do
hip developme
ulting data show
h quality—a ra
ime. We also a
ment as well a
Zealand leaders
d prefer to spen
where they wou
e chart at right
earning and lea
luded that over
y and doesn’t m
st-quality deve
re problematic,
ation of learnin
ng methods to c
ne another unde
W., Yost, P.R., McH
-10 Leadership De
Beyond 70-20-
Global Leadership
Henry, J.J., O’Conn
evelopment.
p Forecast 2014 |
2015
d
w leaders learn
n the job; 20, le
. This ratio orig
ook backward
omething very
rward to how l
originators hav
e prescriptive to
e piece of supp
atio is fact or m
s the illustration
different ratio, o
nd learning fro
isingly, leaders
ning time spent
New Zealand le
n is the 70:20:1
earning from ot
ginated in
d at the retrospe
different, how
leaders should
ve stated public
ool it has becom
portive recent
myth when put t
n at left shows
one that
om others while
s across the glo
t, a ratio that va
eaders identified
d by organizatio
so, we isolated
ent quality as v
wed that a ratio
atio that closely
asked leaders h
s how much tim
s reported that
nd 7.9 hours/m
uld most prefer
shows their po
arning from oth
rreliance on 70
match the pract
elopment or wh
, the 70:20:10 r
ng methods rath
compete rather
ermines their im
ons that provid
d organizations
iewed by the
o of 52:27:21 is
y matches how
how much time
me they’d like
they spend 4.6
month on leader
r spending thos
ointed response
hers.
:20:10
tices of
hat leaders
ratio—in fact,
her than their
r than integratin
mpact and thei
nor, P., & Plunkett,
, M. (2014, May),
2
0
thers;
ective
ever:
seek
cly
me.*
to the
s, the
e
obe
aries
d a
de the
s that
s
e they
to
6
rship
se
e:
any
ng
ir
No
ow Wh
1. Th
hough 70:20
le
eaders genera
pr
roportion of t
le
earning. As su
se
equence com
w
with learning f
o not place to
ercentages. E
omeone (a “m
ogether the rig
ctivities to me
nd the busine
While experien
thers are key
llocating mor
uild foundatio
an have wide
matching up w
references.
rganizations
s a vital comp
stablishing a
n-the-job lear
ob experience
ustained, wel
2. D
pe
so
to
ac
an
3. W
ot
al
bu
ca
m
pr
4. O
is
es
on
jo
su
Pf
Percent Mor
or o
Each Typ
match reality
d a greater
on-the-job
choose and
ormal learnin
y,
g
ght on
ning requires
er”) who can
tion of learnin
s of both lear
put
ng
ners
and learning
ve blend, cons
mal learning
ompetencies
efits while
ers’ learning
from
sider
to
that
n formal learn
learning mix,
nd foundatio
undation ena
y converted in
behavior chan
ning
n for
bles
nto
nge.
aders Want
ing
Austra
at
:10 does not
ally will spend
heir time in o
uch, carefully
mponents of fo
rom others.
oo much weig
Effective learn
master blende
ght combinat
eet the needs
ess.
ntial learning a
to an effectiv
e time on for
onal leader co
-ranging bene
well with leade
benefit when
onent of the
framework a
rning. This fou
es to be easily
l-supported b
re Time Lea
pe of Learn
t
ralia | New Zealan
d