This is a paper about the background, structure and functions of the International Court of Justice.

1. EUROPEAN SCHOOL OF LAW AND GOVERNANCE
International Court of Justice
Background, structure and functions
Professor – Labinot Greicevci
Student – Andi Belegu
Prishtine
12.10.2013

2. This page was purposely left blank from the author
Abstract
Page 2

3. Since the International Court of Justice is one of the most important international juridical organizations
worldwide it is very important to know its background, structure and functions. Founded back in 1945 the
International Court of Justice served as a very important institution regulating the cases of disputes
between states. The international arbitration will also cover a part of this essay, the international
arbitration dates from the last years of the 18th century and has been developing until now. The basement
of the international arbitration is in America where the first arbitral organization was found regarding to
an agreement between United States of America and United Kingdom. Since then the international
arbitration has held a very important role in the development of peace and standards of life in all member
countries and nonmember countries of the United Nations. Since the creation of ICJ the judges dealt with
so many cases, the very first case to be presented in front of ICJ was the dispute between United Kingdom
and Albania the so called The Corfu Channel case.
The structure of the International Court of Justice is very complicated yet very compact and has helped on
finding solutions and arbitrations of different disputes between states. Separated in departments and
chambers the ICJ does its own job investigating and considering the cases deposited by the countries. The
International Court of Justice conducts of nine judges which excludes the ad hoc judges. The present
president of ICJ is president judge Peter Tomka from Slovakia.
The functions of the International Court of Justice are very important to the developments of world
politics. ICJ has two main functions, it has the power to settle disputes between countries and it can give
advisory opinions for developments in countries or international organizations.
Table of Contents
Page 3

4. Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 2
1.
Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 4
2.
The background of the International Court of Justice ........................................................................... 5
3.
Structure ................................................................................................................................................ 8
3.1.
The Chambers of the International Court of Justice ..................................................................... 9
3.2.
The committees of The International Court of Justice ................................................................ 10
3.3.
The cases ..................................................................................................................................... 11
4.
Functions of the International Court of Justice ................................................................................... 12
5.
Conclusion .......................................................................................................................................... 14
6.
Bibliography ....................................................................................................................................... 16
1. Introduction
The background, the structure and the functions of the International Court of Justice is a very wide topic
and a very complicated on. The complications come because it is related to many other organizations,
states and parties. As the International Court of Justice is a very important United Nations institution, it is
very hard to frame the work it does. This essay compiles some basic information and explanations about
the main purposes and main jobs that the International Court of Justice has. This essay tends to give basic
information about the structure, the background and the functions of the International Court of Justice.
The main research question that this essay tends to give answer to is - What is the International Court of
Justice ? The sub questions of the essay are - What are the functions of ICJ ? , What background does ICJ
have ? Based on what structure does it work ? , and What were the precursory institutions of IJC?.
This essay contains historical and juridical information linked to the development of the International
Court of Justice. Here you can see the evolution of the International Court of Justice and other
international arbitration institutions. This essay is structured in three main sections – The background of
the ICJ, the structure and the functions of the International Court of Justice.
Page 4

5. The essay assumes that The International Court of Justice has held a very important role protecting the
peace between states with disputes. Supporting the thesis statement in this paper you can find further
information about cases solved by this institution.
2. The background of the International Court of Justice
The International Court of Justice is one of the largest juridical organisms of the world, as a part of the
primary mechanism of the United Nation. Created in 1945 by the UN charter, the Court first began its
work in 1946, based in the Peace Palace in The Hague, Netherlands. The main function of the Court is to
provide solutions to international law problems of states in accordance with international law, these type
of cases are called Contentious cases and at times may have the obligation to adjudicate which states have
acted accordingly and what states may have violated the International Human Rights card these are
usually known as Advisory proceedings.
Expressed in Article 93 of the UN Charter, all 193 UN members are automatically parties to the Court's
statute. The Court is also made up of five permanent member states; these are The United States of
America, The United Kingdom, France, China & Russia. Non-UN members may also become parties to
the Court's statute under the Article 93(2) procedure. Once a state is a party to the Court's statute, it is
eligible to participate in cases before the Court. Although, being a party to the statute does not
automatically give the Court jurisdiction over disputes involving those parties.
As mentioned before the International Court of Justice was found back in 1945 right after the Second
World War and the creation of the United Nations itself. Since then until 13th of November 2013 the
Page 5

6. International Court of Justice dealt with and gave solutions to 154 cases. The very first case to be entering
this institution was the so called Corfu Channel case between United Kingdom and Albania on 22nd of
May 1947. (Bannelier , Christakis, Heathcote . (2012). The ICJ and the evolution of international law :
the enduring impact of the "Corfu Channel" case – Routledge – New York p. 12)
The background of the International Court of Justice is tightly linked with the international arbitration
history. The international arbitrations dates back on 1794 from the so called the Jay Treaty between the
United States of America and Great Britain. This treaty was a treaty of Amity, Commerce, and
Navigation which gave the green light to the creation of three mixed commissions composed by
Americans and British nationals in equal numbers. Also the Alabama Claims arbitration in 1872 was
another important case which would lead to the need of the creation of an international juridical
institution, also this was the first case where beside the countries with direct involvement to the case were
called also countries without interest such as Italy, Brazil and Switzerland. (Wolf (2011) - The
International Court of Justice : facts and documents about the history and work of the Court –Hague p.
23 ).
The modern history of arbitration also knows some other international juridical organizations preceding
the International Court of Justice. On 1899 the Russian Czar Nicholas the 2nd called for an international
juridical institution which in history would be known as the Hague Peace Conferences on which beside
the powerful countries also were called to participate small countries of Europe and Asia. Following this
conference the International Court of Arbitration was created which started working on 1902. Afterwards
on 1907 a second peace conference was called and involved countries from northern and southern
America. The United States of America, The United Kingdom, and Germany came with a decision
affirming the creation of the Permanent Court of International Justice which unfortunately could not be
created during the conference. Anyway since the Permanent Court of International Justice didn’t see the
light another arbitral institution was created the so called Permanent Court of Arbitration which was
located in the Peace Palace in 1913 would serve as a court of solutions for many cases, the most known
Page 6

7. ones were the case of Carthage and Manouba cases (1913) concerning the seizure of vessels, and of
the Timor Frontiers (1914) and Sovereignty over the Island of Palmas (1928) cases.( http://www.icjcij.org/court/index.php?p1=1&p2=1)
The outbreak of the Second World War on September 1939 “isolated” the work of the Permanent Court
of International Justice with only one judge in Hague and all the others in Geneva the work of the
institution was blocked. Following this there was a need for another institution established in 1945 and
named The International Court of Justice. The first judge president of the International Court of Justice
was President Judge José Gustavo Guerrero (El Salvador) ex president of PCIJ. And the last/present one
is president judge Peter Tomka from Slovakia. ( http://www.icj-cij.org/court/index.php?p1=1&p2=3)
This was a very important step towards the organization and formalization of the cooperation between
countries in the field of the international arbitration. The International Court of Justice for so many years
would serve and still serves as one of the biggest chains of cooperation between countries, furthermore in
some cases maybe more cooperative than United Nations itself.
Since 2000, some of the contentious cases before the ICJ included a property dispute between
Liechtenstein and Germany; a territorial and maritime dispute between Nicaragua and Colombia; a 2003
case by Mexico against the United States over alleged violations of consular communications etc.
In conclusion of the section we can see that during their work these international institutions have given
solutions to different problems, accordingly all the fore mentioned institutions played a very important
role in the continuity of the juridical arbitral system worldwide. Knowing the political and historical
periods on which these institutions were created these institutions played a great role also in supporting
and protecting the world peace. An example of this even though it was created after the biggest war
mankind knows (2nd World War) is the International Court of Justice which gave solutions to disputes
worldwide and prevented countries from territory wars and such delicate problems.
Page 7

8. 3. Structure
The structure of the United Nations is very complex, so is the structure of the International Court of
Justice. The ICJ works as a unique juridical body with a quorum of nine judges which excludes the ad hoc
judges.
The International Court of Justice is made up of fifteen judges elected to nine-year terms by the UN
General Assembly and the UN Security Council, with five judges elected every three years. No two
judges at any given time may be from the same country. According to Article 9, the membership of the
Court is supposed to represent the "main forms of civilization and of the principal legal systems of the
world". Essentially, this has meant common law, civil law and socialist law. Since created, four of the
five permanent members of the Security Council have always had a judge on the Court.
(http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Court_of_Justice#Structure)
The other judges (meaning not the ones from 4 permanent countries) are elected and usually even though
not mandatory come from countries which form the Security Council. Usually there are 3 judges from
Africa, 2 judges from Latin America and the Caribbean, 2 from Asia, Western Europe and other states 5,
and 2 from Eastern Europe. The court is not composed by country representatives so the candidates
should not be government representatives.
In cases of not fulfilling their obligations the judges can be suspended but this has still never happened
since it should not be a one sided decision never did all the judges agree for a suspension.
When deciding cases, the Court applies international law. Article 38 of the ICJ Statute provides that in
arriving at its decisions the Court shall apply international conventions, international custom, and the
Page 8

9. "general principles of law recognized by civilized nations". It may also refer to academic writing and
previous judicial decisions to help interpret the law, although the Court is not formally bound by its
previous decisions under the doctrine of stare decisis. Article 59 makes clear that the common law notion
of precedent or stare decisis does not apply to the decisions of the ICJ. The Court's decision binds only
the parties to that particular controversy. Under 38(1)(d), however, the Court may consider its own
previous decisions.
The judgment of the ICJ is binding and cannot be appealed once the parties have consented to its
jurisdiction and the court has rendered a decision. However, a state's failure to comply with the judgment
violates the U.N. Charter, article 94(2). Noncompliance can be appealed to the U.N. Security Council,
which may either make recommendations or authorize other measures by which the judgment shall be
enforced. A decision by the Security Council to enforce compliance with a judgment rendered by the
court is subject to the Veto power of permanent members.
3.1.
The Chambers of the International Court of Justice
The court also has three types of chambers.
Based on article 29 of the statute of the court it also creates separated chambers “With a view to the
speedy dispatch of business, the Court shall form annually a chamber composed of five judges who, at the
request of the parties, may hear and determine cases by summary procedure. In addition, two judges shall
be selected for the purpose of replacing judges who find it impossible to sit (The Statute of The
International Court of Justice- Article 29) .
 Any chamber, comprising at least three judges, that the Court may form pursuant to Article 26,
paragraph 1, of the Statute to deal with certain categories of cases, such as labor or
communications “The Court may from time to time form one or more chambers, composed of
three or more judges as the Court may determine, for dealing with particular categories of
cases; for example, labor cases and cases relating to transit and communications”( The Statute
of The International Court of Justice- Article 26, point 1) it is important to mention also that
this kind of chamber is not active by this time.
Page 9

10.  Any chamber that the Court may form pursuant to Article 26, paragraph 2, of the Statute to deal
with a particular case, after formally consulting the parties regarding the number of its members
- and informally regarding their name - who will then sit in all phases of the case until its final
conclusion, even if in the meantime they cease to be Members of the Court. The Court may at
any time form a chamber for dealing with a particular case. The number of judges to constitute
such a chamber shall be determined by the Court with the approval of the parties.( The Statute
of The International Court of Justice-Article 26, point 2)
It is important to know that even though some of the chambers didn’t have opportunities to deal with
cases they exist and are very crucial to the work of ICJ. From all these chambers the only chamber
which dealt with cases is the ad hoc chamber which had 6 of them. Currently no ad hoc chamber is
active. (http://www.icj-cij.org/court/index.php?p1=1&p2=4)
3.2.
The committees of The International Court of Justice
Under the administration of the International Court of Justice do also work the committees of the court.
There are several committees working in the ICJ :
 The Budgetary and administrative committee which decides for cases which deal with
administrative matters. This committee is formed by the president of the court, the vicepresident, and four to five judges elected every three years.
 The rules committee which advises the court about the rules, procedures and working methods
on different matters. This committee was established in 1979. The committee is composed from
5 to 6 judges.
 And the last but not the least is the Library committee, which does the gathering of the
information and matters of acquisition of library for the court. Also this committee supervises the
modernization of the services of the court.
Page
10

11. 3.3.
The cases
According to the solution which should be given to different matters the International arbitral system or
the International Court of Justice knows two different types of cases.
 The Contentious Cases – ex. Obligation to Negotiate Access to the Pacific Ocean
(Bolivia v. Chile) - Fixing of time-limits for the filing of the initial pleadings
In this case the court must give jurisdictions according to the international law and should be
respected by both parties.
 Advisory proceedings – ex. Accordance with international law of the unilateral declaration of
independence in respect of Kosovo
In this case the court gives advisory decisions which may or may not be respected by the parties.
The International Court of Justice every year issues an annual report on its job where shows the main
cases dealt with. On the report of 2011-2012 the International Court of Justice claimed to have given
solution to 15 different matters.
Generally speaking, the ICJ has a very compact structure, which until now did not fail doing its job. The
separation of powers within the institution has helped the functioning of this juridical institution for about
50 years of existence. The separation in chambers and departments has helped the ICJ to give very good
decisions based on the investigations they did. The strong separations within the institutions have helped
the institution to not suffer from double competences or similar problems.
Page
11

12. 4. Functions of the International Court of Justice
As an important international institution of the United Nations, ICJ’s main function is to regulate the
relations between different states in cases of problems. Placed in the Peace Palace in Hague the ICJ stands
for the most important juridical institution. The main function of ICJ is to resolve disputes between
sovereign countries. Different disputes can be brought before the court by countries according to the rules
given by the United Nations Security Council. Anyway no state can be brought in front the court without
its own consent. (http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/International+Court+of+Justice)
The International Court of Justice has two main functions:
I.
To settle, in accordance with international law norms the disputes between countries. The
disputes should be submitted mostly by member states of the United Nations, but there can also
be submissions by non United Nations members in special conditions. This is to contentious
where a particular solutions must be taken and must get empowered immediately.
II.
The other function is the power to give advisory opinions to on legal questions referred to it by
authorized UN organs and specialized agencies
What is worth doing discuss is also the political power that this Court has, as a part of the United Nations
it has great power enforcing its decisis. The International Court of Justice has a great impact in the
international policy, but it does not have supremacy on the sovereignty of the state. In fact one of its most
important functions is to protect the countries and their integrity.( Sameh (2003) , The role of the ICJ as
the principal Juridical Organ of the UN, P.H. Kluwer Law International pp.122-131 )
The main problem that the court has is that sometimes its decisions do not consist with the opinions of the
great powers. There is where the problem begins because the court does not have a “police force” which
would empower the laws. It may happen that a decision can be sent to the Security Council, the decision
is vulnerable in front of the veto power of the great powers.
Page
12

13. The court also has the power to enforce agreements between states, there are four kinds of agreement the
court can enforce:
I.
Special agreements (compromise) - “This method is based on explicit consent and is, perhaps, the
most effective basis for the Court's jurisdiction. It is effective because the parties concerned have
a desire for the Court to resolve the dispute, and are thus more likely to comply with the Court's
judgment. Parties will usually define the nature of the dispute between them and the legal
questions on which they wish the Court to rule”
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jurisdiction_of_the_International_Court_of_Justice#Special_agree
ment)
II.
Compromissory Clause (in treaties) - This method is used in international agreements and it is a
special reservation to the main topic. Example –“ Article 32(2) of the United Nations Convention
Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances provides for mediation and
other dispute options, but also states that ”any such dispute which cannot be settled ... shall be
referred, at the request of any one of the States Parties to the dispute, to the International Court
of Justice for decision" (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jurisdiction_of_the_International_Court_of_Justice#endnote_2)
III.
Special treaties –“ Some treaties or conventions in force confer jurisdiction on the Court. It has
become a general international practice to include international agreements - both bilateral and
multilateral - provisions, known as jurisdictional clauses, providing that disputes of a given class
shall or may be submitted to one or more methods for the pacific settlement of disputes.”(
http://www.icj-cij.org/jurisdiction/?p1=5&p2=1&p3=4)
Page
13

14. IV.
Implicit Consent (Forum prorogatum) – “Implied consent is consent which is not expressly
granted by a person, but rather inferred from a person's actions and the facts and circumstances
of a particular situation. The term is most commonly encountered in the context of United States
drunk driving laws.”( Harris (2007) – An Introduction to Law , Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, United Kingdom p.69)
We see here that the International Court of Justice covers a huge part of the international juridical
system, and being one it has also a very big political impact. The power of this institution
indirectly forces historical agreements which for a long time have been rejected by certain
institutions or states.
5. Conclusion
Concluding this essay the International Court of Justice is the most important institution of the United
Nations; from some people it is called the Court of the World. It is one of the main subjects of the United
Nations which is implicated in peace keeping between states. The background of the ICJ is very rich and
contains a lot of institutions which leaded to the creation of this grand institution. During the essay you
could obtain information about the background showed chronologically until the creation of the
institution, than you could get informed about the structure of it the chambers, the committees, presidency
and everything think linked to its structure.
We saw that the International Court of Justice has contributed in the international arbitration and
peacekeeping. With a very compact structure, with separated powers has helped the functioning the
juridical system for about 50 years of existence. The separation in chambers and departments has helped
the ICJ to give very good decisions based on the investigations did. The strong separations within the
institutions have helped the institution to not suffer from double competences or similar problems.
Page
14

15. Furthermore its functions have strongly contributed in the today’s world. This institution brought a
brand new mentality to the politics between the states. Solving the disputes the International Court of
Justice has contributed for a safer world and has made a world a better place to live.
Page
15

16. 6. Bibliography
Academic Sources
Bannelier Karine , Christakis Theodore, Heathcote Sarah, The ICJ and the evolution of international law
-The enduring impact of the "Corfu Channel" case – Routledge – New York 2012
Harris, Phil – An Introduction to Law , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom 2007
M.AMR Sameh Mohammed, The role of the ICJ as the principal Juridical Organ of the UN, P.H. Kluwer
Law International, 2003
Nijmegen Wolf - The International Court of Justice: facts and documents about the history and work of
the Court –Hague 2011
Internet Sources
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/
http://simple.wikipedia.org/
http://www.icj-cij.org/
Documents
The Statute of The International Court of Justice
Page
16

17. Page
17