3. Mark Barber, Agile Coach with ADAPTOVATE
• 20+ years software product delivery
experience
• Now, coaching in enterprise and business
contexts (such as HR and finance)
• Twitter @mark_barbs
6. Some key questions to address today…
• Why is trust important?
• How does transparency help build trust?
• What are key information radiators to promote transparency?
• How do information radiators scale?
9. According to Australian research, less than half of
Australian employees trust their colleagues.
You have better odds of a successful coin toss than finding
trust in Australian organisations
9
Source: Aon Hewitt 2015
12. I have conducted multiple health checks across more than 20 teams in different
organisations over the last 5 years. The results consistently reveal opportunities for
improvement across:
• Autonomy
• Purpose
• Support
Lack of trust is an observable problem
12
14. A cycle of mistrust
14
1. Limited
sharing
2. Unmet
needs
3.
Escalating
pressure
4.Fear and
blame
dominate
15. An example
15
1.Lack of
information from
team on progress
2.Management
cannot answer
questions on
progress from
stakeholders
3.Management
frequently asks for
updates from team
4.Team interprets
this as “micro-
management” and
disengages
16. Another example
16
1.Lack of
information from
management on
strategic goals
2.Teams cannot
link work to
company strategy
3.Lack of
alignment
increases
disengagement in
teams
4.Management
interprets as lack
of accountability
and loses trust in
teams
18. If autonomous teams are the building blocks of agile
organisations then trust is the mortar
19. The top 3 characteristics
required for high performing
teams, according to Google’s
“Project Aristotle”, are built
on trust.
COPYRIGHT GOOGLE RE:WORK
19
21. Trust helps us to move forward faster
21
• Reducing the need for low level governance
• Increasing speed of decision making
• Reducing the need for stage gates
28. Subheading
Body copy
• Bullets
• Bullets
- Secondary bullet
- Secondary bullet
28
An effective practice for increasing transparency is the use of
information radiators to share information
29. Information radiators should be…
• Simple, easy to interpret
Effective information radiators allow people to understand
the current situation at a glance
29
30. Information radiators should be…
• Simple, easy to interpret
• Accessible
Effective information radiators allow people to understand
the current situation at a glance
30
31. Information radiators should be…
• Simple, easy to interpret
• Accessible
• Visual and visible
Effective information radiators allow people to understand
the current situation at a glance
31
32. Information radiators should be…
• Simple, easy to interpret
• Accessible
• Visual and visible
• Actionable where appropriate
Effective information radiators allow people to understand
the current situation at a glance
32
33. Information radiators should be…
• Simple, easy to interpret
• Accessible
• Visual and visible
• Actionable where appropriate
• Current
Effective information radiators allow people to understand
the current situation at a glance
33
34. The minimum information that product development teams should radiate:
• Value (success) metrics
Best information radiators for teams
34
35. Your success metrics are dependent on the work and context, but a
good place to start is with “PIRATE METRICS”:
• AARRR
• Acquisition, Activation, Retention, Revenue, Referral
Visualise and radiate your current answer to this question:
• “How is the work we are doing adding value to our customers and
therefore the organisation?”
• Use dials and charts to represent targets and current values
Success metrics should directly link to our customers and
the value we are providing to the organisation
35
36. The minimum information that product development teams should radiate:
• Value (success) metrics
• (Contextual) progress
Best information radiators for teams
36
39. The minimum information that product development teams should radiate:
• Value (success) metrics
• Contextual progress
• Risks
Best information radiators for teams
39
40. The minimum information that product development teams should radiate:
• Value (success) metrics
• Contextual progress
• Risks
• Team health
Best information radiators for teams
40
42. The minimum information that product development teams should radiate:
• Value (success) metrics
• Contextual progress
• Risks
• Team health
• Continuous improvement initiatives
Best information radiators for teams
42
44. The minimum information that management and leadership teams should radiate:
• Strategic objectives
• Progress to objectives
Best information radiators for managers
44
45. Objectives and roadmaps will show your people where the
organisation is heading and why
45
Key Results
Objective
Improve
Employee
Engagement
Average
weekly
engagement
score of 4.8
Hackathon in
Q2
Flexible
working policy
socialised
Sarah
46. The minimum information that management and leadership teams should radiate:
• Strategic objectives
• Progress to objectives
• Roadmaps and prioritisation
Best information radiators for managers
46
47. Roadmaps give people confidence
Copyright Jason Yip
47
• Start somewhere, start small
• What’s coming, and why
• Transparent prioritisation
• Enable coordination
48. The minimum information that management and leadership teams should radiate:
• Strategic objectives
• Progress to objectives
• Roadmaps and prioritisation
• Continuous improvement initiatives
Best information radiators for managers
48
51. Information can scale to bring clarity to the bigger picture
where needed
51
Move toward…
• Consistency
Move away from…
• Standardisation
52. Information can scale to bring clarity to the bigger picture
where needed
52
Move toward…
• Consistency
• Summarising
Move away from…
• Standardisation
• Collating
53. Information can scale to bring clarity to the bigger picture
where needed
53
Move toward…
• Consistency
• Summarising
• Trends
Move away from…
• Standardisation
• Collating
• Raw data
54. Information can scale to bring clarity to the bigger picture
where needed
54
Move toward…
• Consistency
• Summarising
• Trends
• Visual cues
Move away from…
• Standardisation
• Collating
• Raw data
• Deciphering text
55. Information can scale to bring clarity to the bigger picture
where needed
55
Move toward…
• Consistency
• Summarising
• Trends
• Visual cues
• Empathy
Move away from…
• Standardisation
• Collating
• Raw data
• Deciphering text
• Apathy
56. Information can scale to bring clarity to the bigger picture
where needed
56
Move toward…
• Consistency
• Summarising
• Trends
• Visual cues
• Empathy
• Self-serving (pull)
Move away from…
• Standardisation
• Collating
• Raw data
• Deciphering text
• Apathy
• Serving (push)
58. 58
ADAPTOVATE is hiring!
We are looking for agile
coaches and consultants to
join our team.
If you are interested in
hearing more about us please
come and chat or reach out
via email
careers@adaptovate.com
Editor's Notes
Side note about this being my 4th LAST and to encourage people to speak – they may think they don’t have the ability, I thought my first talk was terrible, but 3 years later I met someone who attended and he said it changed the way their team worked for the better. That’s amazing!
Be constructive and specific
QR codes around the room
What exactly do we mean by trust? In our context, trust can be viewed as the ability to confidently rely on others. To believe in the truth of others.
An optimistic expectation on behaviour.
Mistrust then is the unwillingness or inability to rely on others.
Side Note, while researching for this talk, I pondered “can’t trust” versus “don’t trust” and the implications of either one. As a coach, these are important cues to watch out for
But trust isn’t free, and in many cases, isn’t the default state of relationships within organisations or in general.
Take a minute to reflect on your own experience. Does it get worse in larger organisations? When there’s more or less hierarchy? Is it industry-agnostic?
Does anybody want to share? Maybe you disagree with this, or your experience doesn’t reflect this?
Ask 7 managers in the room to stand up. Make a note, we only trust one of these people! Which one is it?
Framed from the context of trust:
Autonomy -> we are not trusting our teams to do a good job
Purpose -> we don’t trust our leaders’ direction, or they aren’t giving us enough context
Support -> we don’t trust our leaders will support us when we need it
So what does this look like?
Trust can be violated in many ways, but I want to focus on this notion of secrecy – and that is trust violated due to a lack of information.
This is a very common situation that I have observed.
In a PWC innovation survey – companies with higher levels of trust amongst employees also tend to foster a culture that supports innovation.
What does this mean?
Trust allows us to work together in small, autonomous teams without the need to manage each other
It makes us stronger and helps to build a greater whole
Like mortar, trust relies on different components coming together ->
transparency,
respect,
ownership & responsibility
Safety – relying on each other to not react negatively to feedback and ideas
Dependability – the very definition of trust
Structure & Clarity – trust that we are working on the right goals
Trust is represented in many forms in this image:
teams trust management that the problem is the right one to solve
management trust teams that they are collaborating and talking to one another
Trust between teams that we are solving the same problem in a way that supports one another
Tie back to the bricks and mortar metaphor
There are multiple opportunities for coaching and improvement in this cycle.
Most of them are long term –
we can coach people to clearly state their needs and lead others in the right direction,
we can coach people to navigate conflict and tension when needs go unmet.
But there is a change we can make immediately that will have positive impact and work toward breaking the cycle in the short term.
Break that secrecy. Start sharing information.
Long history of information radiators in lean and agile. Consider ->
Kanban and scrum boards
A3 reports
Visual and aural cues in lean manufacturing plants
Kent Beck and Martin Fowler talk about “Big Visible Charts” in Extreme Programming.
Alastair Cockburn coins the term “information radiator” in 2001.
In many industries, information radiators are extremely common (traffic control, weather monitoring, emergency response)
Signs of complicatedness – a legend describing many different things, unnecessary technical knowledge needed to interpret (eg mathematical)
Accessible – radiators should be big, readable, in a location that makes it easy to find and view, be mindful colour combinations for colour blindness
Visual and visible – contributes to simplicity and accessibility, use more pictures than words, charts over numbers, meaningful colour coding. Visible – people should be able to find it without asking.
Web pages, for example, are not information radiators unless they are always displayed on large, accessible monitors
Actionable – make it clear where, when and how people can help
Current – out of date information is often worse than no information at all. But along with currency, changing information motivates people to come and see
Success metrics really should be all we need. But it takes time and maturity to get there.
Explain what “contextual progress” means –
It isn’t enough to say “we have completed 10 stories”. Instead, radiate progress in context – 10 out of how many? What dials are those 10 moving? How close to a next or full release are those 10?
For non-product centric teams, progress can often be synonymous with flow
Why risks? For management, knowing that teams are managing risks is really important. It provides confidence when looking forward.
I’m your manager, If I can’t see your risks, my only options are to bother you repeatedly, or to assume you aren’t managing them at all.
Team health is important to provide context for impacts to progress and success.
If issues within the team are causing things to slow down, measuring and visualizing is a way to share that and get help. It also shows that it’s ok to be imperfect since we all are.
Why continuous improvement – knowledge sharing. As an organization, we grow and uplift one another by sharing knowledge and experiences. If you are experimenting with a new practice or tool, as a member of another team, I’d love to know about that. By also visualizing CI, it tells everyone that it’s not only normal to need to improve, but IMPERATIVE that we do so, and we are free to experiment.
Is this common? Does your management team do retros and share the outcomes? Do they radiate their progress to goals?
Objectives -> give tangible purpose to the work people are doing. Where are we going as an organization?
Progress to objectives -> brings authenticity to your leadership and makes strategy more than just words on a page.
Be transparent about your key results. It shows people you are focused on the right things and increases trust.
Roadmaps -> informs teams to make empowered decision making easier. Knowing what’s coming up gives us confidence.
CI – we model the behavior we want our people to exhibit. Transparent CI helps build a safe culture.
Consistency over standardization – don’t enforce practices (like story points) but aim for consistent types of information, eg delivery confidence
Summarising over collating – focus on granularity – can we radiate holistic progress to bigger goals where applicable, as opposed to that progress having to be interpreted from multiple teams. Another example are OKRs – have traffic lights at the very top, all the way down, so it doesn’t have to be calculated.
”Just the main facts” – from Lilla
Raw metric data across multiple parts of the organization doesn’t tell us much
One teams story point is another team’s story
One teams happiness indicator of 5.5 is another team’s 9.
Trends tell us patterns and make it easy to spot where we should focus
Visual cues over text – ease and simplicity
Empathy over apathy – be mindful of people’s needs. Ask them what they would like to see. Help each other to understand. Don’t make assumptions.
Pull over push – It shouldn’t need to be published or sent. Information should always be there so that when I want it, I can have it.